Cato vs Victoria's Secret
CATO and VSXY side by side, both in apparel and accessory stores. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CATO and VSXY compare
Victoria's Secret is the larger company, worth 168 times as much as Cato ($7.7B against $46.0M).
Victoria's Secret grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.3% versus −1.1% for Cato).
Victoria's Secret keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.5% compared with −0.87% at Cato.
Victoria's Secret scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for Cato), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CATO | VSXY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $46.0M | $7.7B |
| Share price | $2.31 | $96.62 |
| Change, 1 year | −40.2% | 167% |
| Change, 5 years | −88.1% | 88.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.62 | 1.62 |
| Employees | 6,700 | 33K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 22.6× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 1.1× |
| P/B | 0.3× (better) | 7.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.8× |
| P/FCF | 28.3× | 13.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.5% | 7.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $9.49 | $53.62 |
| Margin of safety | 75.7% (better) | −80.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.1% | 10.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.6% | 3.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 150% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 166% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.6% | 39.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | −2.1% | 7.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.87% | 5.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.25% | 8.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −3.3% | 45.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −13.7% | 28.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.98 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.60 |
| Interest coverage | – | 8.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.36 | 1.36 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.80 | 3.11 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.92% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.92% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 29.4% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 1.2% | 11.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$212M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.9% | 14.4% |
Go deeper
- CATO stock overview
- CATO income statement
- CATO valuation and score
- VSXY stock overview
- VSXY income statement
- VSXY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.