Avis Budget vs Ryder System
CAR and R side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CAR and R compare
Ryder System is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as Avis Budget ($10.8B against $3.8B).
Ryder System grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.1% versus 0.45% for Avis Budget).
Ryder System keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.9% compared with −5.4% at Avis Budget.
Ryder System pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; Avis Budget does not pay one.
Ryder System scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for Avis Budget), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CAR | R |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.8B | $10.8B |
| Share price | $107.99 | $282.55 |
| Change, 1 year | −22.3% | 65.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −63.7% | 224% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.85 | 0.88 |
| Employees | 25K | 52K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 23.0× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | – | 3.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 5.5× |
| P/FCF | – | 15.8× |
| FCF yield | – | 6.3% |
| Fair value | $518.71 | $156.13 |
| Margin of safety | 79.2% (better) | −81.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.45% | 1.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.6% (better) | 8.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −2.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 4.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | −5.4% | 3.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 5.4% |
| Return on equity | – | 16.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 2.59 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.19 |
| Current ratio | 0.81 (better) | 0.65 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.44 | 1.40 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 29.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 9.0% |
| Buyback yield | 0.29% | 5.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.29% | 6.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 118% | 91.0% |
| Held by insiders | 2.2% | 4.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.5B | −$41.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 15.2% | 2.4% |
Go deeper
- CAR stock overview
- CAR income statement
- CAR valuation and score
- R stock overview
- R income statement
- R valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.