Conagra Brands vs Kraft Heinz
CAG and KHC side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CAG and KHC compare
Kraft Heinz is the larger company, worth 4.1 times as much as Conagra Brands ($28.9B against $7.0B).
Kraft Heinz grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.6% versus −1.8% for Conagra Brands).
Kraft Heinz keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −13.6% compared with −17.0% at Conagra Brands.
Both pay dividends: Conagra Brands yields 6.0% and Kraft Heinz 6.6%.
Kraft Heinz scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Conagra Brands), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CAG | KHC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.0B | $28.9B |
| Share price | $14.57 | $24.34 |
| Change, 1 year | −16.2% | −0.16% |
| Change, 5 years | −55.3% | −35.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.15 | 0.18 |
| Employees | 17K | 35K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | – | 0.8× |
| P/FCF | 7.9× | 7.6× (better) |
| FCF yield | 12.6% | 13.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $30.34 | $35.82 |
| Margin of safety | 52.0% (better) | 32.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.8% | −1.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.17% (better) | −0.97% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −324% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −326% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.8% | 33.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | −15.2% | −12.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −17.0% | −13.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.8% | 15.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −8.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −4.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.53 |
| Interest coverage | – | −4.7× |
| Current ratio | 1.10 (better) | 1.06 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.04 (better) | 0.50 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.0% | 6.6% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 6.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | 0.64% (better) | 0.10% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.6% | 6.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.9% | 90.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.78% | 0.49% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $896K (better) | −$2.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.3% | 7.9% |
Go deeper
- CAG stock overview
- CAG income statement
- CAG valuation and score
- KHC stock overview
- KHC income statement
- KHC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.