Kraft Heinz vs Mondelez International
KHC and MDLZ side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KHC and MDLZ compare
Mondelez International is the larger company, worth 2.9 times as much as Kraft Heinz ($82.9B against $28.9B).
Mondelez International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.0% versus −1.6% for Kraft Heinz).
Mondelez International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.2% compared with −13.6% at Kraft Heinz.
Both pay dividends: Kraft Heinz yields 6.6% and Mondelez International 3.1%.
Mondelez International scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 11 for Kraft Heinz), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KHC | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $28.9B | $82.9B |
| Share price | $24.34 | $64.94 |
| Change, 1 year | −0.16% | 12.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −35.7% | 4.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.18 | 0.29 |
| Employees | 35K | 91K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 20.5× |
| P/S | 1.2× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 3.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 15.0× |
| P/FCF | 7.6× (better) | 22.7× |
| FCF yield | 13.2% (better) | 4.4% |
| Fair value | $35.82 | $62.90 |
| Margin of safety | 32.0% (better) | −3.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.6% | 6.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.97% | 7.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 15.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 18.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −5.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.4% | 34.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | −12.8% | 13.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −13.6% | 10.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 15.3% (better) | 9.2% |
| Return on equity | −8.8% | 15.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −4.5% | 9.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.53 (better) | 0.82 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.93 |
| Interest coverage | −4.7× | 9.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.06 (better) | 0.62 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.50 | 2.50 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.6% (better) | 3.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 63.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.10% | 1.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 6.7% (better) | 4.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.2% | 86.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.49% | 0.22% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.0M (better) | −$8.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.9% | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- KHC stock overview
- KHC income statement
- KHC valuation and score
- MDLZ stock overview
- MDLZ income statement
- MDLZ valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.