Baozun vs 111
BZUN and YI side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BZUN and YI compare
Baozun grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.6% versus −12.8% for 111).
Baozun scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for 111), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BZUN | YI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $3.60 | $2.93 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.1% | −28.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −78.6% | −94.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.02 | 1.16 |
| Employees | 7,827 | 144 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.6% (better) | −12.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.4% | 8.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 74.1% (better) | 5.8% |
| Operating margin | 0.57% (better) | −0.02% |
| Net margin | −2.4% | – |
| FCF margin | 3.2% (better) | 0.91% |
| Return on equity | −6.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 1.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.33 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −5.20 | −39.46 |
| Interest coverage | 1.3× (better) | −0.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.87 (better) | 1.09 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.6% | 0.01% |
| Held by insiders | 12.9% | 21.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.7M (better) | −$369K |
Go deeper
- BZUN stock overview
- BZUN income statement
- BZUN valuation and score
- YI stock overview
- YI income statement
- YI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.