StockData

Baozun vs Pattern

BZUN and PTRN side by side, both in nonstore retailers. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BZUN and PTRN compare

Pattern grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (42.1% versus 5.6% for Baozun).

Pattern keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.6% compared with −2.4% at Baozun.

Pattern scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 5 for Baozun), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBZUNPTRN
Size and price
Market cap–$3.6B
Share price$3.60$20.36
Change, 1 year14.1%15.0%
Change, 5 years−78.6%–
Beta (5Y)1.021.72
Employees7,8272,300
StockData Score
Total score512 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score13 (better)
Health score36 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–1.1×
P/B–5.5×
EV/EBITDA–20.7×
P/FCF–34.1×
FCF yield–2.9%
Fair value–$16.47
Margin of safety–−23.6%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)5.6%42.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average2.4%–
Net income growth (TTM)–1952%
Profitability
Gross margin74.1% (better)43.7%
Operating margin0.57%4.3% (better)
Net margin−2.4%3.6% (better)
FCF margin3.2%3.2% (better)
Return on equity−6.4%19.6% (better)
Return on invested capital1.9%40.8% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.33 (better)0.00
Net debt / EBITDA−5.20–
Interest coverage1.3×–
Current ratio1.872.32 (better)
Altman Z-score–8.82
Piotroski F-score67 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–0.61%
Shareholder yield–0.61%
Ownership
Held by institutions3.6%36.4%
Held by insiders12.9%74.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months$1.7M (better)−$167M
Short interest, % of float–16.9%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.