Baozun vs D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading
BZUN and HEPS side by side, both in nonstore retailers. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BZUN and HEPS compare
D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.4% versus 5.6% for Baozun).
Baozun scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for D-MARKET Electronic Services & Trading), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BZUN | HEPS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $3.48 | $2.71 |
| Change, 1 year | 9.4% | 16.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −79.3% | −16.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.01 | 1.06 |
| Employees | 7,827 | 3,611 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.6% | 13.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.4% | 41.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 74.1% | – |
| Operating margin | 0.57% (better) | −2.4% |
| Net margin | −2.4% | – |
| FCF margin | 3.2% | – |
| Return on equity | −6.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 1.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.33 | 0.30 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −5.20 | −9.38 |
| Interest coverage | 1.3× (better) | −0.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.87 (better) | 0.89 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.6% | 7.2% |
| Held by insiders | 12.9% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.7M | – |
Go deeper
- BZUN stock overview
- BZUN income statement
- BZUN valuation and score
- HEPS stock overview
- HEPS income statement
- HEPS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.