Baozun vs CDW
BZUN and CDW side by side, both in nonstore retailers. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BZUN and CDW compare
CDW grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.4% versus 5.6% for Baozun).
CDW keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.6% compared with −2.4% at Baozun.
CDW pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Baozun does not pay one.
CDW scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 5 for Baozun), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BZUN | CDW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $19.2B |
| Share price | $3.27 | $153.79 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.1% | −2.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −80.6% | −17.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.02 | 0.95 |
| Employees | 7,827 | 250 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 18.5× |
| P/S | – | 0.8× |
| P/B | – | 7.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 12.5× |
| P/FCF | – | 22.4× |
| FCF yield | – | 4.5% |
| Fair value | – | $181.62 |
| Margin of safety | – | 15.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.6% | 7.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.4% | 4.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 0.33% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 3.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 8.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 74.1% (better) | 21.4% |
| Operating margin | 0.57% | 7.1% (better) |
| Net margin | −2.4% | 4.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.2% | 3.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −6.4% | 44.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.9% | 16.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.33 (better) | 2.38 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −5.20 | 2.76 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.87 (better) | 1.17 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 2.44 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 30.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 13 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 10.2% |
| Buyback yield | – | 4.4% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 6.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.6% | 108% |
| Held by insiders | 12.9% | 0.50% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.6M (better) | −$2.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 7.5% |
Go deeper
- BZUN stock overview
- BZUN income statement
- BZUN valuation and score
- CDW stock overview
- CDW income statement
- CDW valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.