BlueLinx vs QXO
BXC and QXO side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BXC and QXO compare
QXO is the larger company, worth 18 times as much as BlueLinx ($11.5B against $621M).
QXO grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (408% versus 2.1% for BlueLinx).
BlueLinx keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.06% compared with −5.2% at QXO.
BlueLinx scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for QXO), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BXC | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $621M | $11.5B |
| Share price | $79.03 | $11.04 |
| Change, 1 year | 16.4% | −40.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 13.9% | −77.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.46 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 2,160 | 7,794 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 10.7× (better) | 81.1× |
| FCF yield | 9.3% (better) | 1.2% |
| Fair value | $104.52 | $12.94 |
| Margin of safety | 24.4% (better) | 14.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.1% | 408% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.94% | 178% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −107% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −107% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −70.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.8% | 24.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.2% (better) | −3.4% |
| Net margin | −0.06% (better) | −5.2% |
| FCF margin | 1.9% (better) | 1.4% |
| Return on equity | −0.31% (better) | −5.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 4.8% (better) | −2.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.48 (better) | 0.58 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.27 | – |
| Interest coverage | 0.7× (better) | −1.4× |
| Current ratio | 4.01 | 4.11 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.38 (better) | 1.42 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 1.3% (better) | −0.06% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.3% (better) | −0.06% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.8% | 85.8% |
| Held by insiders | 2.1% | 41.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.9M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.6% | 19.3% |
Go deeper
- BXC stock overview
- BXC income statement
- BXC valuation and score
- QXO stock overview
- QXO income statement
- QXO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.