BWX Technologies vs Nordson
BWXT and NDSN side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BWXT and NDSN compare
Nordson is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as BWX Technologies ($18.0B against $12.0B).
On earnings, Nordson is cheaper: it trades at 32.6× trailing earnings, against 33.9× for BWX Technologies.
BWX Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.7% versus 7.0% for Nordson).
Nordson keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.6% compared with 10.1% at BWX Technologies.
Both pay dividends: BWX Technologies yields 0.81% and Nordson 1.1%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BWXT | NDSN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.0B | $18.0B |
| Share price | $130.70 | $322.67 |
| Change, 1 year | −38.8% | 38.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 137% | 23.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 1.01 |
| Employees | 1,300 | 8,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 | 18 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.9× | 32.6× (better) |
| P/S | 3.4× (better) | 6.0× |
| P/B | 9.0× | 5.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 24.6× | 22.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 37.8× | 24.8× (better) |
| PEG | 3.01 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.6% | 4.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $96.24 | $247.33 |
| Margin of safety | −35.8% | −30.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 22.7% (better) | 7.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.5% (better) | 5.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 20.7% | 22.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 20.6% | 24.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.2% | 14.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.1% | 55.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 12.1% | 26.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 10.1% | 18.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.0% | 24.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 28.2% (better) | 17.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.0% | 13.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.51 | 0.53 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.59 | 1.84 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 12.4× (better) | 8.8× |
| Current ratio | 2.40 (better) | 1.82 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.55 | 6.24 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.81% | 1.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 27.1% | 33.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.8% | 15.6% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 1.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.81% | 2.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.4% | 76.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.38% | 0.55% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.0M (better) | −$25.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.6% | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- BWXT stock overview
- BWXT income statement
- BWXT valuation and score
- NDSN stock overview
- NDSN income statement
- NDSN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.