Broadridge Financial Solutions vs MSCI
BR and MSCI side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BR and MSCI compare
MSCI is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Broadridge Financial Solutions ($45.3B against $20.4B).
On earnings, Broadridge Financial Solutions is cheaper: it trades at 18.6× trailing earnings, against 34.1× for MSCI.
MSCI grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.6% versus 8.5% for Broadridge Financial Solutions).
MSCI keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 40.7% compared with 15.0% at Broadridge Financial Solutions.
Both pay dividends: Broadridge Financial Solutions yields 2.2% and MSCI 1.3%.
Broadridge Financial Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (23 against 19 for MSCI), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BR | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $20.4B | $45.3B |
| Share price | $178.82 | $623.38 |
| Change, 1 year | −18.7% | 9.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 2.9% | −4.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 1.18 |
| Employees | 16K | 6,268 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 23 (better) | 19 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.6× (better) | 34.1× |
| P/S | 2.7× (better) | 13.6× |
| P/B | 7.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.2× (better) | 27.3× |
| P/FCF | 15.9× (better) | 28.4× |
| PEG | 0.85 (better) | 2.52 |
| FCF yield | 6.3% (better) | 3.5% |
| Fair value | $234.43 | $576.32 |
| Margin of safety | 23.7% (better) | −8.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.5% | 11.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.4% | 13.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 33.9% (better) | 15.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 35.2% (better) | 21.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 15.6% | 17.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.8% | 83.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 17.4% | 55.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 15.0% | 40.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 17.1% | 47.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 40.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 18.6% | 47.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.15 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.98 (better) | 3.20 |
| Interest coverage | 11.6× (better) | 7.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.24 (better) | 0.89 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.08 | 6.40 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% (better) | 1.3% |
| Payout ratio | 39.4% | 42.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 17 (better) | 11 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.1% | 19.8% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 3.0% | 6.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 5.2% | 7.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.5% | 92.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.47% | 3.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.6M | $8.5M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 2.8% |
Go deeper
- BR stock overview
- BR income statement
- BR valuation and score
- MSCI stock overview
- MSCI income statement
- MSCI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.