Bowhead Specialty vs Hippo
BOW and HIPO side by side, both in fire, marine, and casualty insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BOW and HIPO compare
Bowhead Specialty is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Hippo ($1.1B against $975M).
On earnings, Bowhead Specialty is cheaper: it trades at 18.5× trailing earnings, against 30.0× for Hippo.
Bowhead Specialty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.0% versus 20.6% for Hippo).
Bowhead Specialty keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.1% compared with 5.9% at Hippo.
Bowhead Specialty scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Hippo), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BOW | HIPO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $975M |
| Share price | $34.16 | $36.61 |
| Change, 1 year | 28.8% | 9.0% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −62.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.33 | 1.42 |
| Employees | 296 | 540 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.5× (better) | 30.0× |
| P/S | 1.8× | 1.8× (better) |
| P/B | 2.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.1× | – |
| P/FCF | 3.4× (better) | 7.7× |
| PEG | 0.37 | – |
| FCF yield | 29.2% (better) | 13.0% |
| Fair value | $26.27 | – |
| Margin of safety | −30.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.0% (better) | 20.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 55.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 25.7% (better) | −66.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 26.7% (better) | −66.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 10.1% (better) | 5.9% |
| FCF margin | 53.5% (better) | 23.4% |
| Return on equity | 14.1% (better) | 7.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 0.61 (better) | −0.15 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −0.36% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −0.36% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.7% | 43.7% |
| Held by insiders | 76.6% | 9.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$2.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 19.6% | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- BOW stock overview
- BOW income statement
- BOW valuation and score
- HIPO stock overview
- HIPO income statement
- HIPO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.