Bank of New York Mellon vs US Bancorp
BNY and USB side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BNY and USB compare
Bank of New York Mellon and US Bancorp are about the same size, with market caps of $99.8B and $92.6B.
On earnings, US Bancorp is cheaper: it trades at 11.9× trailing earnings, against 16.3× for Bank of New York Mellon.
Bank of New York Mellon grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.2% versus 6.7% for US Bancorp).
Bank of New York Mellon keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.8% compared with 27.5% at US Bancorp.
Both pay dividends: Bank of New York Mellon yields 1.1% and US Bancorp 3.5%.
US Bancorp scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 14 for Bank of New York Mellon), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BNY | USB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $99.8B | $92.6B |
| Share price | $147.11 | $59.45 |
| Change, 1 year | 37.4% | 27.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 150% | −2.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 48K | 69K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.3× | 11.9× (better) |
| P/S | 4.5× | 3.1× (better) |
| P/B | 2.3× | 1.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 14.0× | – |
| PEG | 0.44 (better) | 1.53 |
| FCF yield | 7.2% | – |
| Fair value | $100.33 | $57.23 |
| Margin of safety | −46.6% | −3.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.2% (better) | 6.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.9% (better) | 4.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 24.8% (better) | 18.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 30.6% (better) | 19.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 14.1% (better) | 8.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 29.8% (better) | 27.5% |
| FCF margin | 32.5% | – |
| Return on equity | 15.0% (better) | 12.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.16 (better) | 0.55 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.32 (better) | 0.29 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | 3.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 23.9% | 39.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 15 | 15 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 10.0% (better) | 4.0% |
| Buyback yield | 4.1% (better) | 0.71% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.2% (better) | 4.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.2% | 82.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.27% | 0.22% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$12.6M (better) | −$12.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.2% | 1.7% |
Go deeper
- BNY stock overview
- BNY income statement
- BNY valuation and score
- USB stock overview
- USB income statement
- USB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.