Bumble vs Match
BMBL and MTCH side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BMBL and MTCH compare
Match is the larger company, worth 12 times as much as Bumble ($9.5B against $790M).
Match grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.7% versus −13.3% for Bumble).
Match pays a dividend yielding 1.9%; Bumble does not pay one.
Match scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 6 for Bumble), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BMBL | MTCH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $790M | $9.5B |
| Share price | $5.99 | $41.41 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.1% | 29.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −88.5% | −74.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | 1.19 |
| Employees | 580 | 2,200 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 14.6× |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 2.7× |
| P/B | 1.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 9.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 8.3× |
| PEG | – | 0.60 |
| FCF yield | – | 12.0% |
| Fair value | $12.13 | $60.11 |
| Margin of safety | 50.6% (better) | 31.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −13.3% | 1.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 7.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 40.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 29.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 72.8% | 74.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | −62.6% | 28.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −58.0% | – |
| FCF margin | – | 32.5% |
| Return on equity | −94.7% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −50.6% | 79.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.87 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.59 |
| Interest coverage | – | 6.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.62 | 1.72 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −1.56 | 1.18 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 6.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 8.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.0% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 38.9% | 5.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$328M | −$2.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 18.2% | 5.3% |
Go deeper
- BMBL stock overview
- BMBL income statement
- BMBL valuation and score
- MTCH stock overview
- MTCH income statement
- MTCH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.