BJ's Wholesale Club vs Target
BJ and TGT side by side, both in variety stores. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BJ and TGT compare
Target is the larger company, worth 5.2 times as much as BJ's Wholesale Club ($70.1B against $13.6B).
On earnings, Target is cheaper: it trades at 16.0× trailing earnings, against 23.5× for BJ's Wholesale Club.
BJ's Wholesale Club grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.1% versus 2.0% for Target).
Target keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.1% compared with 2.6% at BJ's Wholesale Club.
Target pays a dividend yielding 3.0%; BJ's Wholesale Club does not pay one.
Target scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 9 for BJ's Wholesale Club), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BJ | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.6B | $70.1B |
| Share price | $107.32 | $154.38 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.4% | 64.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 73.2% | −39.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.24 | 0.90 |
| Employees | 35K | 415K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 21 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.5× | 16.0× (better) |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 6.2× | 3.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.2× | 9.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 37.8× | 15.7× (better) |
| PEG | 4.50 | 1.49 (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.6% | 6.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $95.22 | $172.88 |
| Margin of safety | −12.7% | 10.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.1% (better) | 2.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.8% (better) | 2.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 2.7% | 11.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 4.8% | 12.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.6% (better) | −1.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.2% | 29.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.8% | 5.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.6% | 4.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.6% | 4.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 27.7% (better) | 26.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 23.5% (better) | 16.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.29 (better) | 0.86 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.52 (better) | 1.11 |
| Interest coverage | – | 14.0× |
| Current ratio | 0.73 | 0.99 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.76 (better) | 3.30 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 47.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 17 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 11.0% |
| Buyback yield | 4.1% (better) | 0.22% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.1% (better) | 3.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 86.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.66% | 0.27% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$18.6M (better) | −$26.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.4% | 3.8% |
Go deeper
- BJ stock overview
- BJ income statement
- BJ valuation and score
- TGT stock overview
- TGT income statement
- TGT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.