Target vs Walmart
TGT and WMT side by side, both in variety stores. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TGT and WMT compare
Walmart is the larger company, worth 14 times as much as Target ($980B against $70.1B).
On earnings, Target is cheaper: it trades at 16.0× trailing earnings, against 44.6× for Walmart.
Walmart grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.2% versus 2.0% for Target).
Target keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.1% compared with 3.0% at Walmart.
Both pay dividends: Target yields 3.0% and Walmart 0.79%.
Target scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 15 for Walmart), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TGT | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $70.1B | $980B |
| Share price | $154.38 | $123.51 |
| Change, 1 year | 64.0% | 20.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −39.3% | 147% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 0.58 |
| Employees | 415K | 2.1M |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 (better) | 15 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.0× (better) | 44.6× |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 1.3× |
| P/B | 3.9× (better) | 10.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.0× (better) | 21.6× |
| P/FCF | 15.7× (better) | 72.5× |
| PEG | 1.49 (better) | 1.83 |
| FCF yield | 6.4% (better) | 1.4% |
| Fair value | $172.88 | $72.78 |
| Margin of safety | 10.7% (better) | −69.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.0% | 6.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.3% | 5.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 11.8% (better) | 3.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.2% (better) | 4.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −1.2% | 11.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.3% (better) | 25.2% |
| Operating margin | 5.6% (better) | 4.4% |
| Net margin | 4.1% (better) | 3.0% |
| FCF margin | 4.1% (better) | 1.8% |
| Return on equity | 26.4% (better) | 23.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 16.9% | 19.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.86 | 0.51 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.11 | 0.82 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 14.0× | 17.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.99 (better) | 0.77 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.30 | 6.35 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.0% (better) | 0.79% |
| Payout ratio | 47.1% | 34.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 17 | 17 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.0% (better) | 5.5% |
| Buyback yield | 0.22% | 0.71% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.2% (better) | 1.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.5% | 37.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.27% | 45.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$26.0M (better) | −$2.9B |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.8% | 1.9% |
Go deeper
- TGT stock overview
- TGT income statement
- TGT valuation and score
- WMT stock overview
- WMT income statement
- WMT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.