Brighthouse Financial vs Voya Financial
BHF and VOYA side by side, both in life insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BHF and VOYA compare
Voya Financial is the larger company, worth 3.5 times as much as Brighthouse Financial ($8.9B against $2.5B).
On earnings, Brighthouse Financial is cheaper: it trades at 3.5× trailing earnings, against 16.5× for Voya Financial.
Voya Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.2% versus 2.6% for Brighthouse Financial).
Brighthouse Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.5% compared with 7.4% at Voya Financial.
Voya Financial pays a dividend yielding 1.9%; Brighthouse Financial does not pay one.
Voya Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Brighthouse Financial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BHF | VOYA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.5B | $8.9B |
| Share price | $43.92 | $98.05 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.1% | 34.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −18.6% | 43.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.08 | 0.90 |
| Employees | 1,400 | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 3.5× (better) | 16.5× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 1.1× |
| P/B | 0.4× (better) | 1.9× |
| PEG | – | 1.22 |
| Fair value | $85.00 | $65.85 |
| Margin of safety | 48.3% (better) | −48.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.6% | 3.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −4.5% | 1.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 25.2% (better) | 14.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 38.3% (better) | 18.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 12.5% (better) | 7.4% |
| Return on equity | 13.6% (better) | 13.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.45 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.03 | 0.07 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.9% |
| Payout ratio | – | 29.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 7 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 24.8% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 5.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 7.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.3% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 1.4% | 0.30% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$6.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- BHF stock overview
- BHF income statement
- BHF valuation and score
- VOYA stock overview
- VOYA income statement
- VOYA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.