StockData

Biofrontera vs Ocular Therapeutix

BFRI and OCUL side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BFRI and OCUL compare

Ocular Therapeutix is the larger company, worth 105 times as much as Biofrontera ($1.5B against $13.9M).

Biofrontera grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.8% versus −9.7% for Ocular Therapeutix).

Biofrontera keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −13.8% compared with −649% at Ocular Therapeutix.

Biofrontera scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 3 for Ocular Therapeutix), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBFRIOCUL
Size and price
Market cap$13.9M$1.5B
Share price$0.938$6.66
Change, 1 year−9.9%−38.5%
Change, 5 years−98.2%−0.45%
Beta (5Y)1.021.26
Employees92325
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)3
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score5 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.3× (better)29.0×
P/B2.3× (better)3.3×
FCF yield−57.0%−18.3% (better)
Fair value–$4.81
Margin of safety–−38.5%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)17.8% (better)−9.7%
Revenue growth, 5Y average17.2%24.4% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin–87.3%
Operating margin−14.2% (better)−681%
Net margin−13.8% (better)−649%
FCF margin−17.2% (better)−530%
Return on equity−988%−93.5% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.17 (better)
Interest coverage–−30.6×
Current ratio1.189.12 (better)
Altman Z-score−6.181.28 (better)
Piotroski F-score34 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions19.7%94.4%
Held by insiders23.6%2.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$2.5M
Short interest, % of float–13.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.