StockData

Biofrontera vs Ocular Therapeutix

BFRI and OCUL side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BFRI and OCUL compare

Ocular Therapeutix is the larger company, worth 131 times as much as Biofrontera ($1.4B against $10.4M).

Biofrontera grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.8% versus −9.7% for Ocular Therapeutix).

Biofrontera keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −12.7% compared with −649% at Ocular Therapeutix.

Biofrontera scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 3 for Ocular Therapeutix), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBFRIOCUL
Size and price
Market cap$10.4M$1.4B
Share price$0.700$6.21
Change, 1 year−28.1%−46.0%
Change, 5 years−98.7%−7.2%
Beta (5Y)0.971.25
Employees92325
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)3
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score4 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.2× (better)27.1×
P/B–3.1×
FCF yield−53.4%−19.6% (better)
Fair value–$4.70
Margin of safety–−32.2%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)29.8% (better)−9.7%
Revenue growth, 5Y average17.2%24.4% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin–87.3%
Operating margin−14.1% (better)−681%
Net margin−12.7% (better)−649%
FCF margin−11.5% (better)−530%
Return on equity–−93.5%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.17
Interest coverage–−30.6×
Current ratio0.789.12 (better)
Altman Z-score−7.800.92 (better)
Piotroski F-score34 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions18.6%94.4%
Held by insiders23.6%2.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$2.5M
Short interest, % of float1.7%13.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.