Barclays vs Inter
BCS and INTR side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BCS and INTR compare
Inter grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.3% versus 3.7% for Barclays).
Barclays keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 64.6% compared with 15.6% at Inter.
Inter scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for Barclays), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BCS | INTR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $22.87 | $4.15 |
| Change, 1 year | 1.6% | −58.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 119% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.15 | 0.48 |
| Employees | 98K | 4,124 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.7% | 31.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | 52.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 13.7% | 44.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 21.6% | 43.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 37.5% | 269% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 97.8% |
| Net margin | 64.6% (better) | 15.6% |
| FCF margin | – | 90.7% |
| Return on equity | 9.2% | 13.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 17.5% | 18.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 2.1% | 39.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 18.1% |
Go deeper
- BCS stock overview
- BCS income statement
- BCS valuation and score
- INTR stock overview
- INTR income statement
- INTR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.