Boise Cascade vs QXO
BCC and QXO side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BCC and QXO compare
QXO is the larger company, worth 4.2 times as much as Boise Cascade ($11.5B against $2.8B).
QXO grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (408% versus −1.5% for Boise Cascade).
Boise Cascade keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.6% compared with −5.2% at QXO.
Boise Cascade pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; QXO does not pay one.
Boise Cascade scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 6 for QXO), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BCC | QXO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.8B | $11.5B |
| Share price | $78.83 | $11.04 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.1% | −40.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 13.0% | −77.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.96 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 7,680 | 7,794 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.7× | – |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | 1.4× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.9× | – |
| P/FCF | 26.6× (better) | 81.1× |
| FCF yield | 3.8% (better) | 1.2% |
| Fair value | $73.06 | $12.94 |
| Margin of safety | −7.9% | 14.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.5% | 408% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.2% | 178% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −59.7% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −56.7% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −4.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.5% | 24.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.5% (better) | −3.4% |
| Net margin | 1.6% (better) | −5.2% |
| FCF margin | 1.6% (better) | 1.4% |
| Return on equity | 5.1% (better) | −5.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.3% (better) | −2.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.22 (better) | 0.58 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.44 | – |
| Interest coverage | 6.5× (better) | −1.4× |
| Current ratio | 2.71 | 4.11 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.28 (better) | 1.42 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | – |
| Payout ratio | 32.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −15.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 7.5% (better) | −0.06% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.6% (better) | −0.06% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.4% | 85.8% |
| Held by insiders | 1.6% | 41.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$666K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.7% | 19.3% |
Go deeper
- BCC stock overview
- BCC income statement
- BCC valuation and score
- QXO stock overview
- QXO income statement
- QXO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.