Brunswick vs Toro
BC and TTC side by side, both in industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BC and TTC compare
Toro is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Brunswick ($10.2B against $5.1B).
On earnings, Brunswick is cheaper: it trades at 24.2× trailing earnings, against 28.7× for Toro.
Brunswick grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.4% versus 5.2% for Toro).
Toro keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.6% compared with 3.7% at Brunswick.
Both pay dividends: Brunswick yields 2.2% and Toro 1.5%.
Toro scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 11 for Brunswick), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BC | TTC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.1B | $10.2B |
| Share price | $78.38 | $107.28 |
| Change, 1 year | 22.5% | 48.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −21.7% | 2.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 14K | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 24.2× (better) | 28.7× |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | 3.0× (better) | 7.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.9× (better) | 17.2× |
| P/FCF | 13.7× (better) | 14.3× |
| FCF yield | 7.3% (better) | 7.0% |
| Fair value | $72.72 | $93.39 |
| Margin of safety | −7.8% (better) | −14.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.4% (better) | 5.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.3% | 5.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 9.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 13.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 0.91% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 26.2% | 33.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.7% | 10.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 3.7% | 7.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.5% | 15.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 12.7% | 26.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 8.2% | 17.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.18 | 0.72 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.78 | 1.24 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.3× | 8.7× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.51 | 1.58 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.12 | 5.31 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% (better) | 1.5% |
| Payout ratio | 53.9% | 41.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.7% (better) | 8.7% |
| Buyback yield | 1.5% | 3.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.7% | 5.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 94.3% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 0.39% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$11.2M (better) | −$14.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.6% | 3.9% |
Go deeper
- BC stock overview
- BC income statement
- BC valuation and score
- TTC stock overview
- TTC income statement
- TTC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.