BancFirst vs Trustmark
BANF and TRMK side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BANF and TRMK compare
BancFirst is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Trustmark ($4.0B against $2.6B).
On earnings, Trustmark is cheaper: it trades at 11.4× trailing earnings, against 15.7× for BancFirst.
BancFirst grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.3% versus 3.8% for Trustmark).
BancFirst keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.9% compared with 28.6% at Trustmark.
Both pay dividends: BancFirst yields 1.7% and Trustmark 2.2%.
Trustmark scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 13 for BancFirst), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BANF | TRMK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.0B | $2.6B |
| Share price | $118.14 | $45.56 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.8% | 18.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 78.1% | 39.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 2,260 | 2,543 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.7× | 11.4× (better) |
| P/S | 5.4× | 3.2× (better) |
| P/B | 2.0× | 1.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 15.8× | 10.2× (better) |
| PEG | 2.18 | 0.24 (better) |
| FCF yield | 6.3% | 9.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $104.91 | $45.64 |
| Margin of safety | −12.6% | 0.17% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.3% (better) | 3.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.2% (better) | 2.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 7.9% (better) | 5.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 7.1% | 9.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 18.8% (better) | 8.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 34.9% (better) | 28.6% |
| FCF margin | 34.2% (better) | 31.5% |
| Return on equity | 13.6% (better) | 11.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.40 (better) | 0.30 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.7% | 2.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 25.6% | 24.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.85% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.7% | 6.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 51.0% | 80.7% |
| Held by insiders | 25.3% | 1.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$26.4M | −$24.2K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 6.0% |
Go deeper
- BANF stock overview
- BANF income statement
- BANF valuation and score
- TRMK stock overview
- TRMK income statement
- TRMK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.