ASE Technology vs Micron Technology
ASX and MU side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ASX and MU compare
Micron Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (256% versus 8.4% for ASE Technology).
Micron Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 63.8% compared with 6.2% at ASE Technology.
Micron Technology pays a dividend yielding 0.06%; ASE Technology does not pay one.
Micron Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (25 against 8 for ASE Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ASX | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $999B |
| Share price | $39.50 | $884.74 |
| Change, 1 year | 174% | 290% |
| Change, 5 years | 445% | 1113% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.35 | 1.88 |
| Employees | 14K | 61K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 25 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 11.9× |
| P/S | – | 7.5× |
| P/B | – | 7.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 16.9× |
| FCF yield | – | 5.9% |
| Fair value | – | $1920.62 |
| Margin of safety | – | 53.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.4% | 256% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.2% | 36.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 23.6% | 895% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 21.5% | 879% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.2% | 70.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 17.7% | 80.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.0% | 74.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.2% | 63.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −3.5% | 44.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 12.1% | 88.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 9.3% | 107% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.69 | 0.04 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.22 (better) | −0.35 |
| Interest coverage | 6.9× | 937× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.26 | 3.31 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 14.11 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.06% |
| Payout ratio | – | 0.72% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 39.6% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.07% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.13% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.4% | 77.8% |
| Held by insiders | 25.3% | 0.22% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$367M | −$302M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 5 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- ASX stock overview
- ASX income statement
- ASX valuation and score
- MU stock overview
- MU income statement
- MU valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.