Academy Sports & Outdoors vs Dillard's
ASO and DDS side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ASO and DDS compare
Dillard's is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as Academy Sports & Outdoors ($10.3B against $3.6B).
Academy Sports & Outdoors grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.7% versus 0.21% for Dillard's).
Dillard's keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.3% compared with 6.4% at Academy Sports & Outdoors.
Both pay dividends: Academy Sports & Outdoors yields 0.98% and Dillard's 0.18%.
Academy Sports & Outdoors scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 11 for Dillard's), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ASO | DDS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.6B | $10.3B |
| Share price | $59.20 | $660.84 |
| Change, 1 year | 21.2% | 8.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 28.8% | 118% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | 1.30 |
| Employees | 23K | 29K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.9× | – |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 1.6× |
| P/B | 1.7× (better) | 4.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.4× (better) | 9.0× |
| P/FCF | 11.0× (better) | 16.3× |
| FCF yield | 9.1% (better) | 6.2% |
| Fair value | $82.21 | $724.85 |
| Margin of safety | 28.0% (better) | 8.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.7% (better) | 0.21% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.2% | 8.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 6.7% | 18.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.2% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 35.8% | 39.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 9.6% | – |
| Net margin | 6.4% | 10.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.4% | 9.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 18.6% | 33.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 20.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.23 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.27 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.74 | 3.03 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.82 | 8.62 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.98% (better) | 0.18% |
| Payout ratio | 9.2% | 71.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 12 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 120% |
| Buyback yield | 7.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 8.7% (better) | 0.18% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 119% | 53.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 48.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.0M | −$244K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.3% | – |
Go deeper
- ASO stock overview
- ASO income statement
- ASO valuation and score
- DDS stock overview
- DDS income statement
- DDS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.