Burlington Stores vs Dillard's
BURL and DDS side by side, both in general merchandise stores. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BURL and DDS compare
Burlington Stores is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Dillard's ($14.9B against $10.3B).
Burlington Stores grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.9% versus 0.21% for Dillard's).
Dillard's keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.3% compared with 5.8% at Burlington Stores.
Dillard's pays a dividend yielding 0.18%; Burlington Stores does not pay one.
Burlington Stores scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 11 for Dillard's), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BURL | DDS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $14.9B | $10.3B |
| Share price | $237.09 | $660.84 |
| Change, 1 year | −15.8% | 8.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −20.4% | 118% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.07 | 1.30 |
| Employees | 83K | 29K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.3× | – |
| P/S | 1.2× (better) | 1.6× |
| P/B | 7.4× | 4.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.0× | 9.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 36.1× | 16.3× (better) |
| PEG | 0.54 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.8% | 6.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $328.50 | $724.85 |
| Margin of safety | 27.8% (better) | 8.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.9% (better) | 0.21% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.9% (better) | 8.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 30.7% (better) | 18.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 31.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 44.6% (better) | 39.8% |
| Net margin | 5.8% | 10.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.4% | 9.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 41.4% (better) | 33.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.96 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.83 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.17 | 3.03 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.71 | 8.62 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.18% |
| Payout ratio | – | 71.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 12 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 120% |
| Buyback yield | 2.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.3% (better) | 0.18% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 53.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.63% | 48.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$15.9M | −$244K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.1% | – |
Go deeper
- BURL stock overview
- BURL income statement
- BURL valuation and score
- DDS stock overview
- DDS income statement
- DDS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.