Ampco Pittsburgh vs ITT
AP and ITT side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AP and ITT compare
ITT is the larger company, worth 127 times as much as Ampco Pittsburgh ($19.2B against $152M).
ITT grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (35.8% versus 1.3% for Ampco Pittsburgh).
ITT keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.1% compared with −13.1% at Ampco Pittsburgh.
ITT pays a dividend yielding 0.70%; Ampco Pittsburgh does not pay one.
ITT scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 2 for Ampco Pittsburgh), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AP | ITT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $152M | $19.2B |
| Share price | $7.34 | $215.01 |
| Change, 1 year | 276% | 12.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 47.1% | 107% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.29 | 1.30 |
| Employees | 1,432 | 12K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 44.2× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 3.7× |
| P/B | 4.7× | 4.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 22.1× |
| P/FCF | 12.8× (better) | 29.7× |
| PEG | – | 3.77 |
| FCF yield | 7.8% (better) | 3.4% |
| Fair value | – | $144.25 |
| Margin of safety | – | −49.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.3% | 35.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.7% | 9.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −13.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −19.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 49.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.9% | 35.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | −10.2% | 14.0% (better) |
| Net margin | −13.1% | 8.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.7% | 12.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | −123% | 11.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −21.6% | 9.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.76 | 0.74 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.94 |
| Interest coverage | −4.0× | 5.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.68 (better) | 1.29 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.66 | 3.07 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.70% |
| Payout ratio | – | 31.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 13 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 15.7% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.91% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 55.7% | 98.7% |
| Held by insiders | 44.8% | 0.60% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $29.4K (better) | −$12.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.1% | 7.3% |
Go deeper
- AP stock overview
- AP income statement
- AP valuation and score
- ITT stock overview
- ITT income statement
- ITT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.