Amentum vs Fidelity National Information Services
AMTM and FIS side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMTM and FIS compare
Fidelity National Information Services is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as Amentum ($15.2B against $5.4B).
On earnings, Fidelity National Information Services is cheaper: it trades at 4.4× trailing earnings, against 26.4× for Amentum.
Fidelity National Information Services grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (23.6% versus 11.4% for Amentum).
Fidelity National Information Services keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 26.8% compared with 1.4% at Amentum.
Fidelity National Information Services pays a dividend yielding 5.8%; Amentum does not pay one.
Fidelity National Information Services scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 9 for Amentum), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMTM | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.4B | $15.2B |
| Share price | $21.95 | $29.54 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.4% | −55.4% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −73.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.21 | 0.95 |
| Employees | 50K | 44K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.4× | 4.4× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | 1.1× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.8× | 7.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 11.3× | 5.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 8.8% | 18.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $27.54 | $78.72 |
| Margin of safety | 20.3% | 62.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.4% | 23.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −3.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 292% | 2179% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 113% | 2381% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 23.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.2% | 35.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.2% | 16.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.4% | 26.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.4% | 21.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.5% | 23.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.5% (better) | 5.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.81 (better) | 1.28 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.65 | 4.40 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.52 (better) | 0.55 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.02 (better) | 0.01 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 5.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 25.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 2.7% |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 8.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.6% | 98.9% |
| Held by insiders | 32.3% | 0.13% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $1.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.5% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- AMTM stock overview
- AMTM income statement
- AMTM valuation and score
- FIS stock overview
- FIS income statement
- FIS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.