Amkor Technology vs Hubbell
AMKR and HUBB side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMKR and HUBB compare
Hubbell is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Amkor Technology ($23.1B against $8.9B).
On earnings, Amkor Technology is cheaper: it trades at 14.6× trailing earnings, against 25.6× for Hubbell.
Hubbell grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.0% versus 15.7% for Amkor Technology).
Hubbell keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.8% compared with 8.3% at Amkor Technology.
Both pay dividends: Amkor Technology yields 0.93% and Hubbell 1.3%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMKR | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.9B | $23.1B |
| Share price | $36.11 | $436.98 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.8% | −3.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 43.0% | 108% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.98 | 0.96 |
| Employees | 31K | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 | 17 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.6× (better) | 25.6× |
| P/S | 1.2× (better) | 3.5× |
| P/B | 1.9× (better) | 5.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.4× (better) | 17.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 24.9× |
| PEG | – | 1.42 |
| FCF yield | −1.7% | 4.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $65.65 | $448.21 |
| Margin of safety | 45.0% (better) | 2.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.7% | 16.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.8% | 9.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 101% (better) | 5.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 98.4% (better) | 6.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 1.4% | 20.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.6% | 35.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 9.5% | 20.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 8.3% | 13.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −2.1% | 14.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 13.6% | 23.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 14.1% | 15.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.51 (better) | 1.25 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.06 (better) | 2.95 |
| Interest coverage | 9.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.17 (better) | 1.53 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.73 | 2.81 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 1.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 13.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 52.7% (better) | 7.7% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.88% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.93% | 2.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 46.9% | 96.7% |
| Held by insiders | 30.9% | 0.41% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$991M | −$18.3M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.4% | 5.0% |
Go deeper
- AMKR stock overview
- AMKR income statement
- AMKR valuation and score
- HUBB stock overview
- HUBB income statement
- HUBB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.