Amkor Technology vs Fabrinet
AMKR and FN side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMKR and FN compare
Fabrinet is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Amkor Technology ($11.7B against $9.8B).
On earnings, Amkor Technology is cheaper: it trades at 17.7× trailing earnings, against 25.1× for Fabrinet.
Fabrinet grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (35.7% versus 17.9% for Amkor Technology).
Fabrinet keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.2% compared with 7.4% at Amkor Technology.
Amkor Technology pays a dividend yielding 0.85%; Fabrinet does not pay one.
Fabrinet scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 16 for Amkor Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMKR | FN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.8B | $11.7B |
| Share price | $39.50 | $327.29 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.8% | −26.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 67.9% | 172% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.94 | 1.60 |
| Employees | 31K | 22K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.7× (better) | 25.1× |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 2.5× |
| P/B | 2.1× (better) | 4.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.4× (better) | 20.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 2778× |
| PEG | – | 1.02 |
| FCF yield | −1.8% | 0.04% (better) |
| Fair value | $64.08 | $355.77 |
| Margin of safety | 38.4% (better) | 8.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.9% | 35.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.8% | 19.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 82.9% (better) | 42.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 81.3% (better) | 42.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 1.4% | 27.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.5% (better) | 12.0% |
| Operating margin | 8.6% | 10.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 7.4% | 10.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | −2.3% | 0.09% (better) |
| Return on equity | 12.6% | 21.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 13.6% | 30.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.53 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.02 | – |
| Interest coverage | 8.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.17 | 2.25 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.87 | 7.87 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.85% | – |
| Payout ratio | 14.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 52.7% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.04% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.85% (better) | 0.04% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 46.8% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 30.8% | 0.52% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$992M | −$17.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.2% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- AMKR stock overview
- AMKR income statement
- AMKR valuation and score
- FN stock overview
- FN income statement
- FN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.