Ametek vs Rockwell Automation
AME and ROK side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AME and ROK compare
Ametek and Rockwell Automation are about the same size, with market caps of $55.3B and $48.4B.
On earnings, Ametek is cheaper: it trades at 35.3× trailing earnings, against 40.9× for Rockwell Automation.
Ametek grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.7% versus 11.3% for Rockwell Automation).
Ametek keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.0% compared with 13.4% at Rockwell Automation.
Both pay dividends: Ametek yields 0.55% and Rockwell Automation 1.3%.
Ametek scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 17 for Rockwell Automation), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AME | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $55.3B | $48.4B |
| Share price | $241.12 | $436.20 |
| Change, 1 year | 30.9% | 18.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 71.1% | 28.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.89 | 1.12 |
| Employees | 13K | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 17 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 35.3× (better) | 40.9× |
| P/S | 7.0× | 5.4× (better) |
| P/B | 4.9× (better) | 13.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.1× | 21.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 30.3× (better) | 32.2× |
| PEG | 4.15 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.3% (better) | 3.1% |
| Fair value | $207.73 | $438.14 |
| Margin of safety | −16.1% | 0.44% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.7% (better) | 11.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.3% (better) | 5.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 9.6% | 23.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 10.1% | 25.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.2% (better) | −2.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.4% | 49.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 25.9% (better) | 22.7% |
| Net margin | 20.0% (better) | 13.4% |
| FCF margin | 23.2% (better) | 16.8% |
| Return on equity | 14.6% | 34.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 13.7% | 26.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.18 (better) | 0.93 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.63 (better) | 1.18 |
| Interest coverage | 21.1× (better) | 14.7× |
| Current ratio | 1.21 (better) | 1.08 |
| Altman Z-score | 8.23 (better) | 6.01 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 1.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 18.9% | 50.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.1% |
| Buyback yield | 0.80% | 1.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.4% | 3.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.7% | 89.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.37% | 0.29% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$28.5M (better) | −$64.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.7% | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- AME stock overview
- AME income statement
- AME valuation and score
- ROK stock overview
- ROK income statement
- ROK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.