StockData

Ambarella vs Himax Technologies

AMBA and HIMX side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AMBA and HIMX compare

Ambarella grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.0% versus −8.2% for Himax Technologies).

Himax Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.3% compared with −13.5% at Ambarella.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAMBAHIMX
Size and price
Market cap$2.8B–
Share price$62.49$9.09
Change, 1 year−33.8%14.2%
Change, 5 years−66.9%−9.1%
Beta (5Y)2.081.80
Employees9591,444
StockData Score
Total score88
Valuation score00
Growth score11
Performance score12 (better)
Health score6 (better)5
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S6.6×–
P/B4.4×–
P/FCF284×–
FCF yield0.35%–
Fair value$61.75–
Margin of safety−1.2%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)20.0% (better)−8.2%
Revenue growth, 5Y average11.9% (better)−1.3%
Net income growth (TTM)–−44.9%
EPS growth (TTM)–−43.5%
EPS growth, 5Y average–−1.5%
Profitability
Gross margin58.5% (better)30.6%
Operating margin−14.9%5.3% (better)
Net margin−13.5%5.3% (better)
FCF margin2.3%14.4% (better)
Return on equity−9.4%4.9% (better)
Return on invested capital−14.8%5.6% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage–12.6×
Current ratio2.85 (better)1.58
Altman Z-score10.38–
Piotroski F-score56 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–148%
Years of dividend growth–1
Buyback yield0.09%–
Shareholder yield0.09%–
Ownership
Held by institutions81.3%11.8%
Held by insiders5.5%24.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$17.1M–
Short interest, % of float11.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.