StockData

Ambarella vs Himax Technologies

AMBA and HIMX side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AMBA and HIMX compare

Ambarella grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.0% versus −8.2% for Himax Technologies).

Himax Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.3% compared with −13.5% at Ambarella.

Ambarella scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Himax Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAMBAHIMX
Size and price
Market cap$2.7B–
Share price$61.06$8.96
Change, 1 year−34.7%15.9%
Change, 5 years−67.6%−10.4%
Beta (5Y)2.071.80
Employees9591,444
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)7
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score11
Performance score11
Health score6 (better)5
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S6.5×–
P/B4.3×–
P/FCF277×–
FCF yield0.36%–
Fair value$61.17–
Margin of safety0.18%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)20.0% (better)−8.2%
Revenue growth, 5Y average11.9% (better)−1.3%
Net income growth (TTM)–−44.9%
EPS growth (TTM)–−43.5%
EPS growth, 5Y average–−1.5%
Profitability
Gross margin58.5% (better)30.6%
Operating margin−14.9%5.3% (better)
Net margin−13.5%5.3% (better)
FCF margin2.3%14.4% (better)
Return on equity−9.4%4.9% (better)
Return on invested capital−14.8%5.6% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage–12.6×
Current ratio2.85 (better)1.58
Altman Z-score10.15–
Piotroski F-score56 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–148%
Years of dividend growth–1
Buyback yield0.09%–
Shareholder yield0.09%–
Ownership
Held by institutions81.3%11.8%
Held by insiders5.5%24.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$17.1M–
Short interest, % of float11.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.