Alight, Inc. / Delaware vs MSCI
ALIT and MSCI side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALIT and MSCI compare
MSCI is the larger company, worth 188 times as much as Alight, Inc. / Delaware ($45.3B against $241M).
MSCI grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.6% versus −3.5% for Alight, Inc. / Delaware).
MSCI keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 40.7% compared with −90.9% at Alight, Inc. / Delaware.
Both pay dividends: Alight, Inc. / Delaware yields 9.0% and MSCI 1.3%.
MSCI scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 9 for Alight, Inc. / Delaware), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALIT | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $241M | $45.3B |
| Share price | $8.93 | $623.38 |
| Change, 1 year | −84.4% | 9.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −96.0% | −4.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.41 | 1.18 |
| Employees | 9,500 | 6,268 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 34.1× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 13.6× |
| P/B | 0.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 27.3× |
| P/FCF | 1.0× (better) | 28.4× |
| PEG | – | 2.52 |
| FCF yield | 104% (better) | 3.5% |
| Fair value | $86.13 | $576.32 |
| Margin of safety | 89.6% (better) | −8.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.5% | 11.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −3.7% | 13.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 15.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 21.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 17.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.1% | 83.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | −95.7% | 55.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −90.9% | 40.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 11.2% | 47.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | −97.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −43.7% | 47.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.95 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.20 |
| Interest coverage | −22.2× | 7.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.42 (better) | 0.89 |
| Altman Z-score | −2.24 | 6.40 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 9.0% (better) | 1.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 42.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 11 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 19.8% |
| Buyback yield | 10.4% (better) | 6.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 19.4% (better) | 7.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 67.3% | 92.8% |
| Held by insiders | – | 3.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $651K | $8.5M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 4 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.8% |
Go deeper
- ALIT stock overview
- ALIT income statement
- ALIT valuation and score
- MSCI stock overview
- MSCI income statement
- MSCI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.