Alliance Laundry vs Middleby
ALH and MIDD side by side, both in industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALH and MIDD compare
Middleby is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Alliance Laundry ($6.3B against $4.8B).
Middleby grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.4% versus 7.8% for Alliance Laundry).
Alliance Laundry keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.7% compared with −13.9% at Middleby.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALH | MIDD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.8B | $6.3B |
| Share price | $24.20 | $138.27 |
| Change, 1 year | −9.5% | 12.2% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −26.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.47 | 1.08 |
| Employees | 3,923 | 2,393 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 8 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.3× | – |
| P/S | 2.7× | 1.8× (better) |
| P/B | 9.8× | 2.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.5× (better) | 12.2× |
| P/FCF | 17.3× | 13.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.8% | 7.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $30.91 | $149.50 |
| Margin of safety | 21.7% (better) | 7.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.8% | 8.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 5.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 78.7% (better) | −211% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 52.9% (better) | −217% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.3% | 38.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 19.6% (better) | 16.5% |
| Net margin | 11.7% (better) | −13.9% |
| FCF margin | 15.4% (better) | 14.2% |
| Return on equity | 119% (better) | −16.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 634% (better) | 8.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.90 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.74 |
| Interest coverage | 4.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.35 | 1.99 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.28 | 3.41 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% | 15.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.6% | 15.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100.0% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | – | 9.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$599M | $15.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 3.7% |
Go deeper
- ALH stock overview
- ALH income statement
- ALH valuation and score
- MIDD stock overview
- MIDD income statement
- MIDD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.