Alcon vs Cooper Companies
ALC and COO side by side, both in measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALC and COO compare
Alcon grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.9% versus 4.7% for Cooper Companies).
Cooper Companies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.5% compared with 9.4% at Alcon.
Cooper Companies scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 7 for Alcon), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALC | COO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $11.3B |
| Share price | $71.45 | $59.55 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.9% | −14.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −16.5% | −43.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.84 | 0.96 |
| Employees | 25K | 500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 20.3× |
| P/S | – | 2.7× |
| P/B | – | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 14.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 16.7× |
| FCF yield | – | 6.0% |
| Fair value | – | $101.80 |
| Margin of safety | – | 41.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.9% (better) | 4.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.8% | 11.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −3.7% | 39.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −3.4% | 43.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 9.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 55.2% | 65.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 13.1% (better) | 12.8% |
| Net margin | 9.4% | 13.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 16.6% (better) | 16.0% |
| Return on equity | 4.5% | 6.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.6% | 5.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.22 (better) | 0.31 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.47 (better) | 2.57 |
| Interest coverage | 6.7× (better) | 6.1× |
| Current ratio | 2.09 (better) | 1.22 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 2.98 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 16.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 5.7% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 5.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 110% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.65% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $3.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.7% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- ALC stock overview
- ALC income statement
- ALC valuation and score
- COO stock overview
- COO income statement
- COO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.