Bausch & Lomb vs Cooper Companies
BLCO and COO side by side, both in measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BLCO and COO compare
Cooper Companies is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Bausch & Lomb ($11.3B against $7.1B).
Bausch & Lomb grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.9% versus 4.7% for Cooper Companies).
Cooper Companies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.5% compared with −3.2% at Bausch & Lomb.
Cooper Companies scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for Bausch & Lomb), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BLCO | COO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.1B | $11.3B |
| Share price | $20.00 | $59.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 29.3% | −14.4% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −43.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.78 | 0.96 |
| Employees | 13K | 500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 20.3× |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 2.7× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.2× | 14.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 52.1× | 16.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.9% | 6.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $27.45 | $101.80 |
| Margin of safety | 27.1% | 41.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.9% (better) | 4.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.4% | 11.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 39.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 43.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 9.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 65.9% |
| Operating margin | 6.1% | 12.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −3.2% | 13.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.6% | 16.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −2.7% | 6.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.3% | 5.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.80 | 0.31 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.42 | 2.57 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.8× | 6.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.55 (better) | 1.22 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.03 | 2.98 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 5.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 5.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 10.7% | 110% |
| Held by insiders | 0.81% | 0.65% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $29.8K | $3.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.84% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- BLCO stock overview
- BLCO income statement
- BLCO valuation and score
- COO stock overview
- COO income statement
- COO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.