Alcon vs Bausch & Lomb
ALC and BLCO side by side, both in measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALC and BLCO compare
Bausch & Lomb grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.9% versus 4.9% for Alcon).
Alcon keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.4% compared with −3.2% at Bausch & Lomb.
Bausch & Lomb scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Alcon), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALC | BLCO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $7.1B |
| Share price | $71.45 | $20.00 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.9% | 29.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −16.5% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.84 | 0.78 |
| Employees | 25K | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 1.3× |
| P/B | – | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 16.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 52.1× |
| FCF yield | – | 1.9% |
| Fair value | – | $27.45 |
| Margin of safety | – | 27.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.9% | 8.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.8% (better) | 8.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −3.7% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −3.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 55.2% | – |
| Operating margin | 13.1% (better) | 6.1% |
| Net margin | 9.4% (better) | −3.2% |
| FCF margin | 16.6% (better) | 2.6% |
| Return on equity | 4.5% (better) | −2.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 4.6% (better) | 2.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.22 (better) | 0.80 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.47 (better) | 6.42 |
| Interest coverage | 6.7× (better) | 0.8× |
| Current ratio | 2.09 (better) | 1.55 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.03 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 16.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 10.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.81% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $29.8K |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 4 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.7% | 0.84% |
Go deeper
- ALC stock overview
- ALC income statement
- ALC valuation and score
- BLCO stock overview
- BLCO income statement
- BLCO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.