Acadia Realty Trust vs Easterly Government Properties
AKR and DEA side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AKR and DEA compare
Acadia Realty Trust is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Easterly Government Properties ($2.6B against $1.1B).
On earnings, Easterly Government Properties is cheaper: it trades at 112× trailing earnings, against 190× for Acadia Realty Trust.
Acadia Realty Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.2% versus 13.0% for Easterly Government Properties).
Acadia Realty Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.1% compared with 2.9% at Easterly Government Properties.
Both pay dividends: Acadia Realty Trust yields 4.2% and Easterly Government Properties 8.1%.
Easterly Government Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 9 for Acadia Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AKR | DEA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.6B | $1.1B |
| Share price | $19.03 | $22.33 |
| Change, 1 year | −0.31% | 3.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −17.6% | −57.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 0.56 |
| Employees | 138 | 55 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 190× | 112× (better) |
| P/S | 6.4× | 3.0× (better) |
| P/B | 1.1× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.1× | – |
| Fair value | $17.14 | $40.99 |
| Margin of safety | −11.0% | 45.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.2% (better) | 13.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.4% (better) | 6.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −22.0% (better) | −41.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −47.4% (better) | −50.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −6.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 77.3% |
| Operating margin | 12.0% | – |
| Net margin | 4.1% (better) | 2.9% |
| Return on equity | 0.73% | 0.77% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.78 (better) | 0.47 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.2% | 8.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 600% | 848% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 22.5% (better) | −5.0% |
| Buyback yield | −10.6% | −3.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −6.4% | 4.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 120% | 77.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.54% | 13.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$553K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.3% | 5.2% |
Go deeper
- AKR stock overview
- AKR income statement
- AKR valuation and score
- DEA stock overview
- DEA income statement
- DEA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.