Akamai Technologies vs Conduent
AKAM and CNDT side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AKAM and CNDT compare
Akamai Technologies is the larger company, worth 56 times as much as Conduent ($13.3B against $240M).
Akamai Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.9% versus −5.7% for Conduent).
Akamai Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for Conduent), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AKAM | CNDT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.3B | $240M |
| Share price | $92.72 | $1.54 |
| Change, 1 year | 27.0% | −34.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −13.6% | −75.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 1.17 |
| Employees | 11K | 51K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.4× | – |
| P/S | 3.1× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 2.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.4× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 13.9× | – |
| FCF yield | 7.2% (better) | −20.5% |
| Fair value | $96.48 | – |
| Margin of safety | 3.9% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.9% (better) | −5.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.6% (better) | −6.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −3.2% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −1.4% (better) | −2600% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −1.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 57.5% (better) | 18.4% |
| Operating margin | 10.5% | – |
| Net margin | 9.5% | – |
| FCF margin | 22.1% (better) | −1.8% |
| Return on equity | 8.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 15.3% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −2.56 |
| Interest coverage | 13.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.64 (better) | 1.55 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.64 (better) | −0.18 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 4.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.6% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 111% | 73.6% |
| Held by insiders | 2.2% | 17.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$17.1M | $655K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.7% | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- AKAM stock overview
- AKAM income statement
- AKAM valuation and score
- CNDT stock overview
- CNDT income statement
- CNDT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.