Akamai Technologies vs Allegion
AKAM and ALLE side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AKAM and ALLE compare
Allegion is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Akamai Technologies ($15.9B against $13.3B).
Allegion grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.6% versus 5.9% for Akamai Technologies).
Allegion pays a dividend yielding 0.89%; Akamai Technologies does not pay one.
Allegion scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Akamai Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AKAM | ALLE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.3B | $15.9B |
| Share price | $92.72 | $186.44 |
| Change, 1 year | 27.0% | 12.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −13.6% | 41.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 0.83 |
| Employees | 11K | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.4× | – |
| P/S | 3.1× (better) | 3.7× |
| P/B | 2.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.4× (better) | 17.0× |
| P/FCF | 13.9× (better) | 23.6× |
| FCF yield | 7.2% (better) | 4.2% |
| Fair value | $96.48 | $141.97 |
| Margin of safety | 3.9% (better) | −31.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.9% | 10.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.6% | 8.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −3.2% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −1.4% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −1.8% | 17.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 57.5% (better) | 44.8% |
| Operating margin | 10.5% | 20.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 9.5% | – |
| FCF margin | 22.1% (better) | 15.6% |
| Return on equity | 8.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 15.3% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.66 |
| Interest coverage | 13.7× (better) | 8.9× |
| Current ratio | 1.64 | 1.93 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.64 | 5.06 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.89% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 11 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 9.8% |
| Buyback yield | 4.6% (better) | 1.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.6% (better) | 1.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 111% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 2.2% | 0.36% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$17.1M | −$2.0M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.7% | 3.1% |
Go deeper
- AKAM stock overview
- AKAM income statement
- AKAM valuation and score
- ALLE stock overview
- ALLE income statement
- ALLE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.