Assurant vs Genworth Financial
AIZ and GNW side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AIZ and GNW compare
Assurant is the larger company, worth 4.4 times as much as Genworth Financial ($14.4B against $3.3B).
On earnings, Assurant is cheaper: it trades at 13.9× trailing earnings, against 16.9× for Genworth Financial.
Assurant grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.4% versus 2.1% for Genworth Financial).
Assurant keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.9% compared with 2.9% at Genworth Financial.
Assurant pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Genworth Financial does not pay one.
Assurant scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 5 for Genworth Financial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AIZ | GNW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $14.4B | $3.3B |
| Share price | $292.80 | $8.78 |
| Change, 1 year | 40.7% | 5.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 80.1% | 101% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.60 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 15K | 3,100 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.9× (better) | 16.9× |
| P/S | 1.1× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | 2.4× | 0.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.5× | 3.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 8.7× | – |
| PEG | 0.28 | – |
| FCF yield | 11.5% | – |
| Fair value | $237.39 | $10.08 |
| Margin of safety | −23.3% | 12.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.4% (better) | 2.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.0% (better) | −2.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 48.3% (better) | 12.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 51.0% (better) | 18.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 19.4% (better) | 9.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 7.9% (better) | 2.9% |
| FCF margin | 12.3% | – |
| Return on equity | 18.3% (better) | 2.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 0.86 (better) | 0.14 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 16.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.2% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.6% | 9.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.8% | 9.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.6% | 86.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.79% | 4.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$11.0M | −$3.7M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- AIZ stock overview
- AIZ income statement
- AIZ valuation and score
- GNW stock overview
- GNW income statement
- GNW valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.