Ashford Hospitality Trust vs Host Hotels & Resorts
AHT and HST side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AHT and HST compare
Host Hotels & Resorts is the larger company, worth 1042 times as much as Ashford Hospitality Trust ($17.3B against $16.6M).
Host Hotels & Resorts grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.9% versus −5.8% for Ashford Hospitality Trust).
Host Hotels & Resorts keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.5% compared with −6.1% at Ashford Hospitality Trust.
Host Hotels & Resorts pays a dividend yielding 6.6%; Ashford Hospitality Trust does not pay one.
Host Hotels & Resorts scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 3 for Ashford Hospitality Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AHT | HST |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.6M | $17.3B |
| Share price | $2.57 | $25.30 |
| Change, 1 year | −46.8% | 55.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −98.4% | 37.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.51 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 82 | 162 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 17.0× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 2.8× |
| P/B | – | 2.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | −0.1× | 9.1× (better) |
| PEG | – | 2.20 |
| Fair value | – | $26.12 |
| Margin of safety | – | 3.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.8% | 4.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.8% | 30.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 55.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 58.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 30.7% | – |
| Operating margin | 20.2% (better) | 14.6% |
| Net margin | −6.1% | 16.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 15.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 16.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 0.9× | 3.8× (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −1.02 | 2.19 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 6.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 63.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 36.6% |
| Buyback yield | 0.25% | 0.43% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.25% | 7.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 24.9% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 0.87% | 0.74% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$5.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 5.8% |
Go deeper
- AHT stock overview
- AHT income statement
- AHT valuation and score
- HST stock overview
- HST income statement
- HST valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.