American Eagle Outfitters vs Victoria's Secret
AEO and VSXY side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AEO and VSXY compare
Victoria's Secret is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as American Eagle Outfitters ($7.7B against $3.3B).
On earnings, American Eagle Outfitters is cheaper: it trades at 10.0× trailing earnings, against 22.6× for Victoria's Secret.
Victoria's Secret grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.3% versus 9.2% for American Eagle Outfitters).
American Eagle Outfitters keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.9% compared with 5.5% at Victoria's Secret.
American Eagle Outfitters pays a dividend yielding 2.5%; Victoria's Secret does not pay one.
American Eagle Outfitters scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 12 for Victoria's Secret), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AEO | VSXY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.3B | $7.7B |
| Share price | $19.61 | $96.62 |
| Change, 1 year | 15.5% | 167% |
| Change, 5 years | −26.2% | 88.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 1.62 |
| Employees | 45K | 33K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.0× (better) | 22.6× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 1.1× |
| P/B | 1.9× (better) | 7.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.8× (better) | 10.8× |
| P/FCF | 9.6× (better) | 13.9× |
| PEG | 0.52 | – |
| FCF yield | 10.5% (better) | 7.2% |
| Fair value | $25.47 | $53.62 |
| Margin of safety | 23.0% (better) | −80.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.2% | 10.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.1% (better) | 3.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 70.9% | 150% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 86.7% | 166% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 40.5% (better) | 39.6% |
| Operating margin | 7.8% | 7.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.9% (better) | 5.5% |
| FCF margin | 6.0% | 8.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 20.4% | 45.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 20.5% | 28.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.03 (better) | 0.98 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.14 | 0.60 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 8.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.59 (better) | 1.36 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.49 (better) | 3.11 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.5% | – |
| Payout ratio | 25.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 29.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.0% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 9.0% | 11.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$39.1M (better) | −$212M |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.0% | 14.4% |
Go deeper
- AEO stock overview
- AEO income statement
- AEO valuation and score
- VSXY stock overview
- VSXY income statement
- VSXY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.