Advanced Energy Industries vs Benchmark Electronics
AEIS and BHE side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AEIS and BHE compare
Advanced Energy Industries is the larger company, worth 3.6 times as much as Benchmark Electronics ($8.9B against $2.5B).
Advanced Energy Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.6% versus 8.9% for Benchmark Electronics).
Both pay dividends: Advanced Energy Industries yields 0.18% and Benchmark Electronics 0.99%.
Benchmark Electronics scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 9 for Advanced Energy Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AEIS | BHE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.9B | $2.5B |
| Share price | $222.06 | $68.37 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.7% | 56.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 133% | 161% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.45 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 13K | 12K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 46.5× |
| P/S | 4.4× | 0.9× (better) |
| P/B | 6.1× | 2.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 26.4× | 16.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 103× | 19.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.97% | 5.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $172.73 | $53.05 |
| Margin of safety | −28.6% (better) | −28.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.6% (better) | 8.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.9% | 5.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 46.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 50.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 1.9% | 12.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.3% (better) | 10.3% |
| Operating margin | 13.2% (better) | 3.4% |
| Net margin | – | 1.9% |
| FCF margin | 4.3% | 4.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 4.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 19.8% (better) | 6.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.87 | 0.16 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.40 | −0.93 |
| Interest coverage | 17.1× (better) | 6.0× |
| Current ratio | 3.79 (better) | 1.99 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.71 (better) | 3.55 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | 0.99% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 45.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.08% | 0.68% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.26% | 1.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 2.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$34.4M | −$12.9M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- AEIS stock overview
- AEIS income statement
- AEIS valuation and score
- BHE stock overview
- BHE income statement
- BHE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.