Enact vs Crawford
ACT and CRD.A side by side, both in insurance agents, brokers, and service. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ACT and CRD.A compare
Enact is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as Crawford ($6.5B against $610M).
Enact grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.5% versus −4.1% for Crawford).
Both pay dividends: Enact yields 1.9% and Crawford 2.4%.
Crawford scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 6 for Enact), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ACT | CRD.A |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.5B | $610M |
| Share price | $47.18 | $12.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 35.1% | 16.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 103% | 38.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.52 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 419 | 9,943 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.9× | – |
| P/S | 5.2× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 3.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.1× |
| P/FCF | – | 6.3× |
| PEG | 6.21 | – |
| FCF yield | – | 15.8% |
| Fair value | $108.87 | – |
| Margin of safety | 56.7% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.5% (better) | −4.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.2% | 5.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −20.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 8.2% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 14.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 27.8% |
| Net margin | – | 1.8% |
| FCF margin | – | 7.4% |
| Return on equity | – | 12.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.06 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.42 |
| Current ratio | – | 1.19 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.47 (better) | 2.88 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.9% | 2.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 62.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Buyback yield | 6.5% (better) | 3.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.4% (better) | 5.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 21.7% | 36.9% |
| Held by insiders | 90.6% | 26.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$280M | −$15.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 21.2% | – |
Go deeper
- ACT stock overview
- ACT income statement
- ACT valuation and score
- CRD.A stock overview
- CRD.A income statement
- CRD.A valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.