StockData

Aecom vs Stantec

ACM and STN side by side, both in engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ACM and STN compare

Stantec grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.6% versus −4.2% for Aecom).

Aecom pays a dividend yielding 1.8%; Stantec does not pay one.

Aecom scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for Stantec), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricACMSTN
Size and price
Market cap$9.1B–
Share price$70.50$85.69
Change, 1 year−46.9%−20.6%
Change, 5 years−3.5%50.1%
Beta (5Y)0.810.75
Employees51K–
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)5
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score12 (better)
Dividend score3 (better)0
Valuation
P/E32.3×–
P/S0.6×–
P/B4.1×–
EV/EBITDA15.4×–
P/FCF44.6×–
PEG1.32–
FCF yield2.2%–
Fair value$66.83–
Margin of safety−5.5%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−4.2%8.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average4.0%11.5% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−53.1%–
EPS growth (TTM)−52.5%32.5% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average–22.4%
Profitability
Gross margin5.7%–
Operating margin4.1%–
Net margin1.9%–
FCF margin1.3%–
Return on equity12.3%–
Return on invested capital14.4%–
Financial health
Debt / equity1.240.56 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA2.39–
Interest coverage3.1×–
Current ratio1.061.23 (better)
Altman Z-score1.87–
Piotroski F-score7–
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield1.8%–
Payout ratio52.0%–
Buyback yield7.1%–
Shareholder yield8.9%–
Ownership
Held by institutions92.9%62.0%
Held by insiders0.66%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$2.5M–
Short interest, % of float4.6%–

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.