ACI Worldwide vs BILL
ACIW and BILL side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ACIW and BILL compare
ACI Worldwide is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as BILL ($6.1B against $4.6B).
On earnings, ACI Worldwide is cheaper: it trades at 37.5× trailing earnings, against 109× for BILL.
BILL grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.6% versus 1.9% for ACI Worldwide).
ACI Worldwide keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.5% compared with 3.2% at BILL.
BILL scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 10 for ACI Worldwide), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ACIW | BILL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.1B | $4.6B |
| Share price | $60.79 | $54.48 |
| Change, 1 year | 27.8% | 4.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 84.7% | −82.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.00 | 1.81 |
| Employees | 2,930 | 1,683 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 37.5× (better) | 109× |
| P/S | 3.5× | 2.9× (better) |
| P/B | 4.1× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.8× (better) | 56.0× |
| P/FCF | 17.1× | 11.2× (better) |
| PEG | 1.85 | – |
| FCF yield | 5.8% | 8.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $42.64 | $22.65 |
| Margin of safety | −42.6% (better) | −141% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.9% | 13.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.3% | 47.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −36.0% | 336% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −34.7% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 28.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 47.0% | 80.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 14.9% (better) | −0.10% |
| Net margin | 9.5% (better) | 3.2% |
| FCF margin | 20.3% | 25.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.2% (better) | 1.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.0% (better) | −0.09% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.55 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.67 | – |
| Interest coverage | 5.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.56 (better) | 1.50 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.13 (better) | 0.55 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 3.4% | 17.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% | 17.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 115% |
| Held by insiders | 1.9% | 11.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $224K (better) | −$19.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.8% | 14.3% |
Go deeper
- ACIW stock overview
- ACIW income statement
- ACIW valuation and score
- BILL stock overview
- BILL income statement
- BILL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.