Arch Capital vs Markel
ACGL and MKL side by side, both in fire, marine, and casualty insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ACGL and MKL compare
Arch Capital is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Markel ($36.3B against $23.2B).
On earnings, Arch Capital is cheaper: it trades at 8.3× trailing earnings, against 10.4× for Markel.
Markel grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.5% versus 0.40% for Arch Capital).
Arch Capital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 24.4% compared with 14.7% at Markel.
Arch Capital scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 7 for Markel), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ACGL | MKL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $36.3B | $23.2B |
| Share price | $106.36 | $1869.82 |
| Change, 1 year | 23.9% | 2.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 145% | 42.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.41 | 0.56 |
| Employees | 8,000 | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 8.3× (better) | 10.4× |
| P/S | 1.9× | 1.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.5× | 1.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 6.4× |
| P/FCF | 6.0× (better) | 10.9× |
| PEG | 0.18 | – |
| FCF yield | 16.7% (better) | 9.1% |
| Fair value | $118.54 | $2061.96 |
| Margin of safety | 10.3% (better) | 9.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.40% | 3.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.6% (better) | 9.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 25.7% (better) | 2.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 32.1% (better) | 6.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 28.4% (better) | 24.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 19.9% |
| Net margin | 24.4% (better) | 14.7% |
| FCF margin | 31.5% (better) | 13.7% |
| Return on equity | 19.9% (better) | 12.6% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 17.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 15.2× |
| Altman Z-score | 1.06 (better) | 0.94 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 9.6% (better) | 2.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 9.6% (better) | 2.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.6% | 79.1% |
| Held by insiders | 5.5% | 1.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$28.7M | −$3.3M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 4 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- ACGL stock overview
- ACGL income statement
- ACGL valuation and score
- MKL stock overview
- MKL income statement
- MKL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.