Alcoa vs Howmet Aerospace
AA and HWM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AA and HWM compare
Howmet Aerospace is the larger company, worth 7.7 times as much as Alcoa ($79.4B against $10.3B).
On earnings, Alcoa is cheaper: it trades at 6.8× trailing earnings, against 39.0× for Howmet Aerospace.
Howmet Aerospace grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.0% versus 11.2% for Alcoa).
Howmet Aerospace keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 21.1% compared with 10.7% at Alcoa.
Both pay dividends: Alcoa yields 1.0% and Howmet Aerospace 0.25%.
Howmet Aerospace scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 15 for Alcoa), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AA | HWM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.3B | $79.4B |
| Share price | $39.19 | $199.22 |
| Change, 1 year | 0.72% | −2.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −18.1% | 496% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.69 | 1.15 |
| Employees | 15K | 730 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 6.8× (better) | 39.0× |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 8.2× |
| P/B | – | 13.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.4× (better) | 27.3× |
| P/FCF | 11.6× (better) | 41.2× |
| PEG | – | 0.79 |
| FCF yield | 8.6% (better) | 2.4% |
| Fair value | $98.71 | $147.92 |
| Margin of safety | 60.3% (better) | −34.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.2% | 22.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.7% | 9.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 33.3% | 41.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 43.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.9% | 36.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | – | 28.1% |
| Net margin | 10.7% | 21.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.2% | 19.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 37.7% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 25.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.77 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.17 (better) | 1.29 |
| Current ratio | 2.31 (better) | 1.86 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.59 | 8.52 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.0% (better) | 0.25% |
| Payout ratio | 6.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 85.6% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.0% | 1.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 77.9% | 91.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.45% | 1.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.3M (better) | −$22.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- AA stock overview
- AA income statement
- AA valuation and score
- HWM stock overview
- HWM income statement
- HWM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.